A reliable (disqualified) source recently informed me that in his search criteria for a wife (a topic worth a standalone post), the criteria I did not meet for him was ambition. I corrected him, quick as lightning, that his observation was erroneous — I have ambition, but I lack ability (presently).
As if in tacit agreement, he promptly caveated his position, remarking that my primary issue is that I have not yet demonstrated ability. That is, being on the cusp of graduation (my thesis is under review), and having never held a full-time job from birth, I haven’t had a chance to establish myself yet.
In other words, I have potential, theoretically [+] (?)
However, realistically, potential with no demonstrated outcome is worthless [-] — yes, darlings, regardless of how IPOs function in practice.
It was a sobering revelation: I was aware of all of the above but had failed to connect it to my place in the marriage market in the past. In retrospect, it adds up: men who were established did not want me because I was, I am, not yet established. (That and among other things.)
You seek someone better than you; you settle for someone as good as you. Lies, games, partner evaluations: all the same if the outcome is equivalent.
And hence we must speak about him, my lover: what does he see in me? Is he able to see something in my future that I can’t, yet? Does he believe in my potential?
Or, almost frighteningly — to him, am I enough as I am? Because I am not enough, not to myself, not ever, possibly never.
Why does he love me?
I don’t know.
Even if I were to ask him point-blank, even if he could respond in a decipherable string, it will take a long time before I can comprehend his reply.
But every time I’m his arms, I instinctively understand that some things do not need to be said —
there are questions not answerable by words.